Key takeaways

  • Reciprocity is the felt duty to repay a gift or favor, and a sociologist argued in 1960 that this duty is part of moral codes everywhere.
  • In a 1971 lab study, men who got an unasked-for soft drink from a fellow participant later bought more raffle tickets from him.
  • The pressure to repay worked even when people did not especially like the giver.
  • In a store, a free gift can open a chain of purchases, because buying is the easiest way to give something back.

At a glance

In one line
Feeling you owe something back after a gift or favor, and repaying it by buying from the giver.
Also called
Norm of reciprocity, Reciprocation
First described by
Dennis T. Regan, 1971
Original study
Regan, D. T. (1971). Effects of a favor and liking on compliance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7(6), 627 to 639.
Shelf
Other people

Reciprocity is the urge to give something back when someone gives you something first. A favor, a gift or even a small kindness leaves a feeling of debt, and most people want to clear it.

In a store, there is usually only one way to clear it: buy. That is why so many sales begin with something free, from a sample at the counter to a salesperson’s extra half hour. The gift is small. The purchase that repays it often is not, and it can be the first link in a longer chain.

The soft drink and the raffle tickets

In 1971 the psychologist Dennis Regan published a laboratory experiment in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. The men who took part believed they were in a study alongside another participant. In fact that second man was a confederate, a member of the research team playing a part.

Regan changed two things. First, he made the confederate seem more or less likable. Second, he varied a favor. Some participants got a soft drink that the confederate brought them without being asked. Others got a soft drink from the experimenter, and others got nothing at all.

Afterward the confederate asked each participant to buy some raffle tickets. Regan recorded how many tickets they bought and how much they liked the man selling them.

The favor worked. Men who had received the drink from the confederate liked him more and bought more of his raffle tickets. Making the confederate more or less likable had only a weak effect. And when Regan looked closely at the ratings, the link between the drink and the buying did not seem to run through liking. It seemed to come from pressure to repay, the sense that a favor received is a favor owed.

That sense already had a name. In 1960 the sociologist Alvin Gouldner had described “the norm of reciprocity” in the American Sociological Review, arguing that a moral rule to repay benefits is one of the universal parts of moral codes. He quoted the Finnish philosopher Edward Westermarck, who wrote that repaying a benefit is “probably everywhere, at least under certain circumstances, regarded as a duty.”

The mint with the check

In 2002 the researchers Strohmetz, Rind, Fisher and Lynn tested the idea in restaurants. In downtown Ithaca, New York, across 92 dining parties, a small piece of chocolate with the check raised the average tip from 15.1 percent to 17.8 percent of the bill.

At an upscale Italian-American restaurant in central New Jersey, one server tried four versions with 80 parties. Tips averaged 18.95 percent with no candy, 19.59 percent with one piece per diner and 21.62 percent with two. When she gave one piece, then turned back as she was leaving and offered each diner a second, tips reached 22.99 percent. That was the same candy as the two-piece version. Only her apparent generosity changed. The authors judged that reciprocity explained the results better than a good impression or a good mood.

Why a small gift feels like a debt

Gouldner’s answer is that repaying a benefit is a moral norm, shared so widely that it feels like a duty rather than a choice. Not repaying feels like breaking a rule.

Regan’s study adds that the pressure does not depend on liking the giver. You can feel you owe a stranger, or a salesperson you found pushy. The restaurant studies add a third point: how generous a gesture seems matters, not only its size. A favor that looks personal and unplanned pulls harder than the same gift handed over as routine.

How a free favor fills a closet

Say a shoe store offers a free gait check and spends 40 minutes with you on a treadmill. You came to look. You leave with $120 running shoes, because walking out after all that help feels wrong. At home the new shoes make your old socks and shorts look tired, so you add $30 in running socks and a $50 jacket. A month later, a $60 watch to track your runs seems like the obvious next step. One free favor became $260 of spending, a clear case of the Diderot effect, where each new thing makes the next one feel necessary. The gift opened the chain. The obligation paid for the first link.

Where the free extras come with a bill

The first move, a gift, turns up in many places:

  • Free samples. A taste at the counter costs the store little and makes walking past feel ungrateful. The zero-price effect makes the sample look better; reciprocity makes you want to repay it.
  • Free consultations and fittings. A makeover, a fitting or a design session puts real time and attention in your hands before you have spent anything.
  • Small personal gestures. The mint with the check, or a discount a clerk offers as something special just for you, is built to feel personal.
  • Free trials. A trial offered as a favor works twice: you feel you owe the seller, and the endowment effect makes the thing feel like yours.
  • Free upgrades and shipping. Extras framed as a favor create the same small debt. Our page on the Diderot effect in marketing shows how sellers use the free upgrade.

How to take a gift without owing a purchase

  1. Separate the thanks from the sale. A thank-you repays a favor. A purchase is not owed. Say thanks, mean it, and treat buying as a separate question.
  2. Decide before the freebie. Before a consultation, a fitting or a tasting, write down what you came to buy and your top price. If the answer is nothing, that stays the answer.
  3. Ask the blank-slate question. Would you buy this from someone who had given you nothing? If not, the gift is doing the deciding.
  4. Wait after any favor. For anything you want right after a free extra, wait a day. For bigger items, use the 30-day rule.
  5. Total the chain. Before adding matching pieces, run the first purchase and everything it seems to need through the Chain Cost Calculator.

When paying it back is fair

Returning favors is how good relationships work, and there is nothing wrong with feeling the pull. When a server takes real care of your table, a tip is fair. When a small shop fixes a problem for free, a repeat visit or an honest review is a fair way to say thanks.

The test is who you are repaying, and for what. Are you paying a person back for help you actually received, or paying a company for a gesture designed to make you feel you owe it? If it is the first, give back gladly. If it is the second, a thank-you settles the account.

A spending example

A store gives you a free 30-minute fitting for jeans, and a salesperson pins two pairs before you have decided anything. You buy one pair for $80 because walking out feels rude, then add a $40 belt and $30 shoes the salesperson suggests to go with them. The free fitting turned into a $150 visit.

How sellers use it

Sellers give first. Free samples at the counter, gifts with purchase, free consultations and fittings, a mint with the check, free shipping framed as a favor and a clerk's discount offered as a personal favor all create a small debt. The quickest way to settle it is to buy, and often to buy more than you planned.

How to push back

Take the gift and say thank you, because thanks repays a favor and a purchase is not owed. Decide what you will buy, if anything, before the sample or the consultation starts. Then ask whether you would buy this from someone who had given you nothing, and wait a day if the answer is unclear.

Questions readers ask

How is reciprocity different from the zero-price effect?

The zero-price effect is about value: a price of zero makes a thing look better than it is. Reciprocity is about debt. A gift makes you feel you owe the person who gave it, and that feeling lasts after the gift itself is gone. The two often arrive together, as with a free sample handed over by a friendly clerk. The free part makes the sample look better, and the handing over creates the pull to buy something in return.

Is returning a favor to a business always a mistake?

No. Returning favors is how good relationships work, and rewarding good service you actually received is fair. A tip for a server who took real care of your table, a repeat visit to a shop that fixed your problem for nothing, or an honest review are reasonable ways to say thanks. The trouble starts when the gift is a gesture built to make you feel you owe something, and the only repayment on offer is a purchase you did not plan.

How does reciprocity relate to the Diderot effect?

They work on different ends of the same chain. Reciprocity often starts it. A free fitting or a free consultation leaves you feeling you should buy one thing. The Diderot effect then keeps it going: the new item makes the things around it look wrong, so it seems to need matching pieces. The gift supplies the first purchase, and the first purchase supplies the reasons for the next ones.

Sources

  1. Regan (1971), Effects of a favor and liking on compliance, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 7(6) The experiment in which an unasked-for soft drink led people to buy more raffle tickets from the giver.
  2. Gouldner (1960), The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement, American Sociological Review 25(2) The sociologist's case that repaying a benefit is a moral norm found in nearly every society.
  3. Strohmetz, Rind, Fisher and Lynn (2002), Sweetening the till: The use of candy to increase restaurant tipping, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32(2) Two restaurant studies in which a piece of candy with the check raised tips, most of all when the server came back with a second piece.
  4. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion (Robert B. Cialdini, Morrow, revised edition 1993), library record The book that made reciprocation one of six widely known principles of persuasion; first published in 1984.

Page history: first published .